|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
You may have heard about some big bills coming from the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power this season, but the biggest bill of all may be the $172,930 in damages allegedly left behind by a notorious graffiti crew whose suspected members include a longtime DWP employee.
In a surprising development for Downtown Los Angeles, prosecutors have charged four men in connection with a yearlong graffiti vandalism spree that left historic buildings, commercial properties and public spaces covered in massive spray-painted lettering. Among those accused is 38-year-old Javier Rezendez Rocha, an employee of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power since 2018.
The announcement came October 15, 2026, when Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman and Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell revealed details of an investigation involving graffiti crews, climbing equipment, drones and alleged profits from merchandise sales.
From City Employee to Criminal Defendant
Rocha, who worked as an electrical craft helper for LADWP, now faces 12 felony counts of vandalism for allegedly participating in graffiti attacks between August 2025 and August 2026.
Investigators say the defendants went to extraordinary lengths to reach difficult locations, using ladders, ropes and specialized climbing equipment to scale buildings before spraying enormous graffiti markings along their exterior walls.
The alleged operation went beyond spray paint. Authorities say drones were used to record the activity, producing footage that could be circulated online. Prosecutors also allege that the group made money selling merchandise associated with its graffiti.
Even more troubling, authorities say city-owned equipment was allegedly used during the incidents and appeared in material posted online, raising questions about whether public resources were used to damage private property.
Historic Downtown Buildings Among the Targets
The alleged vandalism extended across 12 locations in Los Angeles, including 11 sites in and around Downtown LA and another in the Mid-Wilshire area.
Among the locations identified in the criminal complaint are properties associated with the historic Cameo Theatre and Roxie Theatre, two surviving landmarks along Broadway’s once-famous theater corridor. Pershing Square was also among the locations identified.
For Downtown property owners, graffiti removal can be especially expensive when historic materials are involved. Cleaning old brick, stone and decorative facades requires care to avoid damaging architectural features that have survived for generations.
According to prosecutors, the total documented repair costs reached $172,930, a figure that represents the financial damage alleged in the criminal case, not a fine already imposed by the court.
Four Men, Multiple Felony Charges
Along with Rocha, prosecutors identified Michael Ray Gonzales, 40, of Pico Rivera, who faces seven felony vandalism counts; Francisco Rodriguez Aguilar, 37, of West Covina, who faces two counts; and Richard Evan Ward II, 45, of Oceanside, who also faces two counts.
The criminal case was filed October 8. Ward pleaded not guilty October 12, while Rocha is scheduled for arraignment October 23 and Rodriguez Aguilar on October 19. Gonzales is expected to be arraigned at a later date.
If convicted on all charges, Rocha could face a maximum of 10 years and four months in county jail. Gonzales faces up to seven years, while Aguilar and Ward each face up to three years and eight months.
Hochman has also indicated that prosecutors will seek court-ordered graffiti cleanup as part of the defendants’ punishment.
Graffiti, Social Media and the Price of Fame
The case also raises questions about the increasingly public nature of large-scale graffiti vandalism.
Unlike traditional graffiti writers who often operated anonymously, some contemporary crews document their activities with professional-quality videos, drone footage and social media posts. Their work can attract online attention and, according to prosecutors in thi case, generate revenue through branded merchandise.
Hochman characterized the alleged motive as financial gain and social media exposure rather than artistic expression.
For Los Angeles, the distinction between sanctioned street art and illegal graffiti remains significant. Downtown is home to internationally recognized murals and a longstanding community of street artists. Authorized murals involve property-owner permission and, where required, city review. Unauthorized graffiti can leave property owners responsible for costly cleanup.
Questions for the DWP
The involvement of an LADWP employee introduces another dimension to the investigation.
Rocha had worked for the public utility for approximately eight years when the charges were announced. Authorities have alleged that city-owned equipment was used in connection with the vandalism, but the extent of any equipment misuse and whether LADWP has taken disciplinary action remain unclear.
For a department responsible for maintaining some of Los Angeles’ most critical infrastructure, allegations involving an employee’s access to specialized climbing equipment raise questions about oversight and accountability.
The investigation has not established that LADWP management knew of or authorized the alleged activity.
Who Will Pay the Bill?
For property owners, the most immediate concern is recovering the money spent removing the graffiti.
The documented $172,930 in repairs represents a substantial expense for businesses and building owners, particularly those responsible for maintaining historic properties.
Whether the defendants will ultimately be ordered to pay restitution remains a question for the courts. No criminal conviction or final restitution order has been announced in this case.
The LAPD investigation and prosecution by the District Attorney’s Central Trials Division are ongoing. All four defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
Meanwhile, Downtown Los Angeles is left with another expensive cleanup and a troubling allegation: one of the people entrusted with helping maintain the city’s essential infrastructure may have been involved in damaging the very buildings that help define it.
And while DWP customers continue paying their monthly utility bills, the question surrounding this particular bill is much larger.
Who will be held responsible for the $172,930 in damage, and who will ultimately pay to make Downtown whole again?
Reporting based on the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s October 15, 2026 announcement and contemporary reporting by the Los Angeles Times and MyNewsLA. The reported graffiti crew’s name or tag has not been independently verified as “Endem.”
I can also monitor the October 23 arraignment and report what happens to the LADWP employee, including any restitution or employment consequences.
